A.
$2.2 trillion of properties acquired or refinanced
after this point in early 2004 have lost value since
the transaction. Many of these properties, typically
leveraged 70%–80%, would face significant
refinancing hurdles even if prices held firm. Few
lenders now are willing to advance more than
50%–60% of value.
B.
The equity in $1.3 trillion of properties is at great
risk if not already wiped out since properties acquired
or refinanced in 2006–2008 have seen
price declines of 25% or more. The analysis includes
only office, industrial, apartment and retail
properties of significant size. Hotels, land, other
property types and smaller properties would add
billions more to the total.
C.
Property sales so far in 2009 equates to just 7%
of volume achieved at the peak in the first half of
2007. While sales volume this year barely registers
on the graph, the jump in activity in June is clearly
visible and may be an early signal that buyers are
returning, lured by lower prices.
D.
Prices for office, industrial, retail and apartment
properties nationally have dropped 37% from the
peak as measured by the Moody’s/REAL index.
Prices have dropped rapidly and recorded an 18%
decline in the first five months of 2009.
E.
The value of distressed properties has more than
doubled so far in 2009. A total of $93b of office,
industrial, retail, and apartment properties in
the US have fallen into default, foreclosure or
bankruptcy this cycle. Troubled hotels and other
commercial property types add at least another
$31b to the total.
F.
Less than 10% of the distressed situations that have
emerged have been resolved. Lenders have been
slow to foreclose on assets and the phrase “pretend
& extend” has recently entered the vernacular.
G.
Loans originated in 2007, the market peak, are
seeing the highest levels of default although loans
dating from 2004–2006 are also problematic and
are likely to remain so as they reach maturity over
the next few years.